An Ethical Approach When Institutions Can't Be Trusted

Truth in the Fog: 

By the EAPCS Collective

In a world where trust in institutions has been shattered—where the Department of Justice is accused of hiding evidence and the media plays the part of a polished PR firm for power—how do we ethically handle new revelations?

The recent article from Raging Patriot News alleges that the Biden DOJ deliberately hid evidence in politically sensitive investigations. It’s not just the claim that’s alarming—it’s that, increasingly, people believe there’s no neutral ground left.

Let’s walk through how we, as ethically-minded individuals and organizations, navigate this minefield:

1. Hold Truth as Sacred—But Don’t Assume You Already Have It

Even if the DOJ has hidden evidence, our ethical duty isn't to shout first and sort it out later. It’s to approach every claim with disciplined curiosity, not knee-jerk reaction.

🔎 Ask: What is the claim? Who is making it? What’s their motive?

🛑 Don’t: Automatically believe or automatically dismiss, no matter how much you distrust the source or the opposition.

Ethics tip: Believing something because you want it to be true is no better than ignoring it because you're afraid it's true.

2. Triangulate the Truth

If you can’t trust traditional media, you still need a method to avoid becoming a megaphone for misinformation. The ethical path is triangulation:

  • Compare the claim across ideologically diverse independent outlets

  • Look for original documents—court filings, hearing transcripts, leaked memos

  • Check the timeline: When did the event happen? Who knew what, when?

Even if you believe all institutions are corrupt, discrepancies in their own words can reveal a lot. (Ask any defense attorney.)

3. Disclose Bias Transparently

If you're going to present this information to your audience (like we are now), do it ethically:

  • State your distrust of traditional outlets

  • Clarify what is confirmed, what is alleged, and what is your own conclusion

  • Let people know the source's perspective and potential agenda

✍️ Example: “This report comes from a source with a clear ideological position. We share it here not as unquestioned fact, but as part of a broader inquiry into truth in a broken system.”

4. Ethics Without Institutions

Let’s not sugarcoat it: when institutions break down, ethics become even more important.

📜 That means:

  • Don’t twist the truth to “fight fire with fire”

  • Don’t share unproven claims as settled fact

  • Do invite discussion, dissent, and scrutiny

The moment we stop doing that—even to “fight evil”—we become part of the problem.

5. Focus on Patterns, Not Just Headlines

If the DOJ hid evidence, that’s one piece of a larger pattern. But ethical people zoom out:

  • Is there a trend of selective prosecution?

  • Are whistleblowers being silenced?

  • Are those in power shielded from accountability?

Use specific allegations to point toward systemic issues, not just to score points against your political enemies.

🧭 Final Word from EAPCS

Ethics exists not to protect institutions—but to protect people from them. When institutions fail, ethics must rise. That means truth-seeking with humility, boldness with clarity, and outrage tempered by discernment.

The story may or may not be true. But how we respond to it—with integrity, transparency, and rigor—is what determines whether we rise above the corruption… or fall into it.

Justice isn't blind—it’s been gagged. Ethics must speak.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts